mental health

Robocop and a cautionary workplace tale

There are movies you watch as a kid and think, “Cool.” And then there are movies you revisit as an adult and think, “…wait a minute, is this a cautionary tale about my job?”

Enter RoboCop.

At first glance, it’s peak 80s dystopian sci-fi. It’s a crime-ridden Detroit, corporate overreach, shiny metal justice film. A fallen police officer is resurrected as a part-man, part-machine law enforcement weapon. Efficient. Tireless. Obedient.

What’s not to love?

Well, everything, once you let it sit with you for five minutes longer than the average popcorn chew.

Let’s start with the obvious psychological discomfort.
A man dies violently and tragically on the job. And instead of honoring that sacrifice with rest, dignity, or (dare I say) a pension, his brain is salvaged and put back to work.

Resurrected. To continue working.

If that’s not the most extreme metaphor for burnout culture, I don’t know what is.

We often talk about “giving your all” at work. RoboCop asks,  what happens when your “all” is taken literally?

There is something deeply unsettling and familiar about the idea that even death isn’t a boundary. That productivity can outlive personhood. That identity can be stripped down to function.

Murphy, the man, becomes RoboCop, the role.

And in that transformation lies a quiet psychological horror.
He doesn’t just lose his body. He loses agency, memory, autonomy. His humanity becomes a glitch in the system. An inconvenience. Something to be overridden in favor of directives and performance metrics.

Sound dramatic?

Sure.

Also, sounds a little like modern workforce culture on a bad day, right?

We praise resilience. We reward overextension. We glamorize the grind. We whisper things like “push through,” “stay strong,” “be a team player,” as if limits are moral failings instead of biological realities.

RoboCop doesn’t burn out. He can’t. That’s the point.

Because burnout requires a self that can feel exhaustion, resentment, depletion.
Take that away and you get perfect compliance.

Which raises an uncomfortable question. How much of ourselves are we expected to trade for productivity before we start to resemble something less human?

The brilliance of RoboCop isn’t just in its satire of corporate power. It’s in how it forces us to confront boundaries or the lack thereof.

Murphy never got to say, “I’m done.” He never got to opt out.
He never got to rest.

And yet, somewhere deep inside the machinery, fragments of him fight back. Memories flicker. Identity pushes through code. Humanity insists on itself.

Because even in a system designed to erase it, the self resists.

So maybe the real takeaway isn’t just “don’t become RoboCop.”
(It’s a solid starting point.)

Maybe it’s this.

Set your boundaries before someone or something sets them for you. Rest before you are forced to. And don’t confuse being valued with being used efficiently.

Because the difference between the two?

Is everything human.

1 reply »

  1. The Age of “Robocop” Reflecting Somewhat Dear Miriam
    of What Was to Come in 1987 for the Human Dilemma Yes Now

    Of Keeping Our Humanity in an Increasingly Technological Influenced

    Life Yet of Course

    At Best We aRe ALL

    A Hybrid Balance of
    Science and Art Where

    Science Shows Mechanical
    Cognition to the Exclusion
    of Social Empathetic Intelligences

    Withers Away Our Humanity ThiS WaY
    Until We May Become Stuffed Shirts of Tin Men And
    or Women in Whatever Mechanical Cognition Work We Do

    And Surely the Cutting Edge of Hemispherical Science
    Iain McGilchrist Reflects this Problem Well in His 1500
    Page Book Well Referenced in a Decade of Research Yep

    “The Matter With Things”

    Yes Like gaining Proficiencies
    in Mechanical Cognition to Wager
    The Best War For Making More Money
    And Gaining More Things in Life Yep even

    Status
    And Power

    And What Often
    Comes as Human
    Corruption after Our
    Social Empathetic Cognition Withers away

    Hmm Indeed on the Autism Spectrum of the
    Old still new Asperger’s Flavor i Have an Inclination for
    An Extreme Systemizing Way of Mechanical Cognition Yes

    Where Social Empathetic Artistic Emotional Intelligences Just Wither away

    Indeed i even measured it before i received the Asperger’s Diagnosis With

    Simon Baron-Cohen’s Autism Quotient Scan Registering a Moderate somewhat
    Balanced Score of 28 when Still Working With People instead of being Usually
    Trapped Behind a Computer Screen at work doing Mechanical Cognition farther

    And farther
    Away from
    What Makes
    Our Humanity
    Richer together and warm

    Indeed After 5 Years my Score
    Increased to 45 out of 50 and
    Eventually My Mind Re-Wired itself into

    Yikes!

    i-Robot
    Land for me

    And In A Way
    Always Enforcing
    the Law of Order
    In all the Systemizing
    Science Ways That Became
    My New Existence as iRobot then

    Yet of course on the Autism Spectrum
    There is More of the Propensity for the
    Extreme Canary in the Cold Mind of iRobot Indeed…

    Nah i wouldn’t go
    Back to that existence
    For all the Money in the World
    That i’ll Never Need Now with
    More Things and Limiting Factors

    of Humanity
    Like Power
    And Status too

    It’s enough to dance
    and sing free keeps
    all the Nuts and Bolts
    of Existence Socially Lubricated

    For a real Meaningful Life Together Of Warm Connections

    Now Yep even in the ‘Big Blue Room’ Far Beyond iRobot screens

    Yet again a balance Is Okay Not Unlike my Hybrid Vehicle That

    Still Drives
    Smoothly
    Without Much
    Expensive Dino-Juice

    as Nope my Humanity
    Is Not going extinct like them

    for
    now
    at Least

    Reptiles are cool
    Yet Not Nearly
    As Warm

    As ‘Old
    Coke’ Humanity..:)

    Like

I welcome your thoughts