Culture

Mimi-ism: I’m Not Being Distant—I’m Buffering



You ever get that look?

That “Are you mad at me?” look. 
That “Why aren’t you responding to my third message in 30 seconds?” 
That “You’re being quiet and I don’t like it” energy?

Yeah. That one.

Well here’s the thing: 
I’m not being distant. 
I’m buffering.

Like that little spinning circle on your screen when you’re trying to stream an episode and your Wi-Fi decides it needs a union break.

I am mentally loading. 
Emotionally circling. 
Spiritually waiting for the page to refresh.

Sometimes I am buffering because I’m tired. 
Sometimes I’m buffering because I’ve reached my human interaction limit. 
And sometimes—brace yourself—I’m buffering because I simply don’t feel like engaging at that moment and that… is also valid.

We live in a world that treats responsiveness as a moral obligation. If you don’t respond instantly, you’re cold. If you take time to think, you’re shady. If you take a breath before reacting, you’re labeled “distant” or worse—“uninterested.”

But what if I’m just… a soul with a loading bar?

What if my brain needs a moment to sync with my heart? What if my tongue is waiting on an emotional software update? What if I’m just a person trying not to give a knee-jerk response that ends with regret and a slice of humble pie?

Buffering isn’t avoidance. It’s preservation.

So next time you see me staring off into the distance or pausing before I reply, don’t assume I’m aloof. Don’t assume I’m cold.

Just know—I’m buffering.

And I’ll be back once I’ve got full signal.

2 replies »

  1. I do the same. In my eyes that is the whole point of messages, that one can react whenever one has time or feels like it. I don’t even take calls when I am cooking for example. Usually I have my phone on silent because I don’t want to hear the pings all the time. But I am not working anymore, so I don’t have to be available if I don’t want to.

    Like

I welcome your thoughts