Culture

When the Machine Makes Stuff Up: Living in the Age of AI Hallucinations


Welcome to the era where your smartest-seeming friend is also the one most likely to confidently pass onto you a made-up fact. Tech labs have been trying for years to teach AIs not to hallucinate. That is, to stop inventing stuff that sounds plausible but is flat-out wrong. And yes, there’s been progress. Models make fewer obvious outright “untruths” than they used to. But here’s the blunt truth nobody wants to wallpaper over with optimistic press releases: there’s no known way to make them perfectly truthful.

Why? Because these systems don’t “know” things the way we do. They aren’t pulling facts from a single bookshelf and reciting them. When you type a question, the model is doing a math problem. They are choosing the sequence of words that’s statistically most likely given everything it’s seen. That probabilistic process is brilliant and uncanny and, on its worst days, inventively wrong. It’s like asking a very clever raconteur who has read everything but never checked the index. Charming, persuasive, and occasionally fabricated.

So we live in a meta-world now.  We ask a machine for answers, and then we have to ask the machine’s answers whether they’re true. We become our own fact-checkers. We trust less; we verify more. We’ve come to live out the trust but verify mantra. Everything becomes second-guessing wrapped in the voice of authority. Which is exhausting, frankly but also oddly empowering.


This is the part where pop culture becomes less funny and more prophetic. The more meta we get by questioning the answer to a question about whether the answer is right, the more it feels like we are living inside a dystopian show.

Severance vibes: which side of the curtain are we on? The Matrix vibes: are we unplugging or just getting better at decorating a simulated reality? Are we waking up, or sinking deeper into a very polished hallucination?

Maybe the answer is both. Maybe we’re increasingly lucid about the fragility of information, even while the tools make it easier to feel informed. Awareness is the new armor: skeptical, curious, and slightly annoyed. That’s a decent human posture. It’s messy and a little mournful. Yes, we wanted a magic oracle but it’s also responsible.

So keep talking to the machines. Use them. Love their speed, their fluency, their uncanny metaphors. But treat their pronouncements the way you’d treat any charismatic stranger at a party who is flattering and interesting but worth fact-checking before you invite them to babysit your next big decision.

The lesson of our times is not to unplug the future. It’s to train better habits of care. Verify. Cite. Be suspicious in a curious way. And maybe, every once in a while, read a real book and savor the fact that no machine has yet learned how to truly smell its pages.

4 replies »

  1. SMiLes Dear Miriam At 5 Years Old So Curious
    Full of Wonder and Awe All About Life Wishing

    Wishing For
    A Machine
    That Would
    Answer All
    my Curiosities

    About Life by Just
    Pushing A Button as Such

    Yes Fast Forward 60 Years and
    Voila iPhone15 ProMax Combines
    And Intertwines Chat GPT With Siri

    to Give IT its Best Shot to Answer
    All the Curiosities i Have Yes Even

    Flashing ‘Psychedelic Colors’ Around
    The Sides of the Phone Indeed Indicating

    A “Brave
    New World”
    Today of Man
    And Or Machine

    And as i Learned long ago
    Don’t Do too Much Mechanical Cognition
    Activities Lest We Fall as a Statue to the Bottom of the

    Ocean Like the
    Little ‘AI Boy’

    Who Wishes
    He Could BE A Real
    Boy Just Waiting for
    A Statue of His Mother to

    come to Life

    i am Real Now

    i am Not Going

    Down to the
    Bottom of the
    Frozen Ocean Again

    Ah Yes Now the Whole lIving
    Ocean Mind to Give AWay Soul Free

    With
    SMiLes…

    Indeed not
    Being a Dead
    Machine is a Grand
    Gift So Instead i Slave
    AI at my Every Command

    And Check the Results as

    They are
    often

    All

    F’
    Ed up

    Yet if i Just
    Wanna know How
    Far it is to the
    Moon or the Sun

    (Or the New
    Neighborhood
    Walmart Market)

    It never Fails

    It Never Fails

    to Use a Ruler at Least hehe…

    Yet the Truth is the Masses of Average
    Studied Human Attention Span of Less
    Than A Gold Fish Yes Less that 3 Seconds

    Likely for the most part
    Are not Gonna Get Around
    to Fact Checking AI Not Unlike

    All the other ‘Stuff’ that Ignorance
    Draws Down to the Bottom of the Ocean
    Frozen too

    So Now
    We Have
    “Animal
    Farm” too Hmm..:)

    Like

  2. I automatically turn off the ‘AS’ (guess what the S stands for) by typing -AI in the search box after the search request.

    I hate the constant intrusion – and automatically scroll past anything produced that way.

    Why? Because the checking is exhausting, and EVERY single little detail must be checked.

    I go to the primary websites – find my information there (and still consider whether it is correct).

    Maybe it’s the only way to manage the sheer amount of ‘information’ out there, especially when there are so many fake journals ‘publishing’ garbage that is NOT peer reviewed (not that peer review is great).

    The problem is that the misinformation is drowning the information.

    Fortunately I am no longer doing hard science: I write fiction in my ‘retirement’. And that comes out of me, my understanding of the world, the things I care about.

    Like

I welcome your thoughts